Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: 4th down data.
Eagles Forum > Philadelphia Eagles Message Board > Philadelphia Eagles or Football Related Discussion
nephillymike
http://blog.minitab.com/blog/the-statistic...ing-on-4th-down

32% is the chance not 20%.

Still, I don't know what the hell the analytics guys are seeing to say that was the odds to play in that spot.

I think I could find many holes in that analysis.
Pila
No. You pin them with a punt in that spot. That's what analytics should be saying if it was adequately dealing with real life factors.
Zero
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 24 2017, 06:16 PM) *
http://blog.minitab.com/blog/the-statistic...ing-on-4th-down

32% is the chance not 20%.

Still, I don't know what the hell the analytics guys are seeing to say that was the odds to play in that spot.

I think I could find many holes in that analysis.

They can say what they want and support it with whatever numbers they can create, it was still dumb.
The Franchise
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 24 2017, 06:16 PM) *
32% is the chance not 20%.

Still, I don't know what the hell the analytics guys are seeing to say that was the odds to play in that spot.

I think I could find many holes in that analysis.


I've torn apart too many of Kevin Rudy's bullshit 'studies' to count. Click on his name, and his profile pic should tell you all you need to know about his knowledge of different dynamics in sports. He's another one who twists data to support passing the ball 80% of the time.

I couldn't open up the tab where he specifies his data, but it's heavily implied that most of it is from college football. There's no fucking way in hell an NFL probability of going for it on 4th and 8 is 32%. And nobody who understands anything about the game would say anything other than it was a completely stupid decision by Pederson. I hope the press pushes him hard on that.
nephillymike
Curiosity is killing me, though.

Mikeynumbers would like the chance to rip it to shreds.
Eyrie
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 25 2017, 12:31 AM) *
Curiosity is killing me, though.

Mikeynumbers would like the chance to rip it to shreds.

I can fix that for you without any effort - just insert a decimal point between the 3 and the 2 to get the real world odds.

As I said at the time, I'd have supported going for it if we only needed 2 or 3 yards, but not eight. That would have still been a bad decision even if we had converted.
The Franchise
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 24 2017, 06:31 PM) *
Curiosity is killing me, though.

Mikeynumbers would like the chance to rip it to shreds.


There's more than enough info given to automatically dismiss his study. Look at some of his other ones. I really hope this is just a hobby for him, and poor saps don't pay him for 'predictions.'
The Franchise
Bump.

Click on his name and look at his pic. That's the guy who inspired 4th and 8. Feel good about that? laugh.gif
bwc2112
Kevin Rudy ? That's my dipshit neighbors kid and the prick still isn't finished mowing my damn lawn ! ac6.gif
The Franchise
QUOTE (bwc2112 @ Sep 29 2017, 09:43 AM) *
Kevin Rudy ? That's my dipshit neighbors kid and the prick still isn't finished mowing my damn lawn ! ac6.gif


Maybe he crunched some numbers, and the data showed that your grass won't grow too much before it starts snowing. laugh.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2017 Invision Power Services, Inc.