Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Who wanted Blount cut?
Eagles Forum > Philadelphia Eagles Message Board > Philadelphia Eagles or Football Related Discussion
Pages: 1, 2
Birdwatcher
Looks pretty good to me now that the games are real
mcnabbulous
I haven't seen them use him on one stretch play yet
CT_Eagle
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 10 2017, 07:17 PM) *
I haven't seen them use him on one stretch play yet


They tried one to the outside. He was tackled in the back field.
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (CT_Eagle @ Sep 10 2017, 01:24 PM) *
They tried one to the outside. He was tackled in the back field.

Ah that's right.
The Franchise
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 10 2017, 01:17 PM) *
I haven't seen them use him on one stretch play yet


I haven't seen Sproles throw any touchdowns either. Oh wait, it's as if they're using him properly.
The Franchise
Idiots wanted him cut. End of story.
nephillymike
2and 26 to Blount, really?
The Franchise
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 10 2017, 03:23 PM) *
2and 26 to Blount, really?


When I said 'using him properly,' I meant as a North/South runner. Good call Pedey. laugh.gif
nephillymike
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 10 2017, 02:27 PM) *
When I said 'using him properly,' I meant as a North/South runner. Good call Pedey. laugh.gif

He had to go North, 26 yards.
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 10 2017, 01:43 PM) *
I haven't seen Sproles throw any touchdowns either. Oh wait, it's as if they're using him properly.

That was my point
mcnabbulous
Woof

https://twitter.com/mattlombardophl/status/...028273745166336
The Franchise
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 13 2017, 09:09 PM) *


Terrible cut, just bad vision on the play. I'm pretty sure I could've picked up almost 10 there.
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 13 2017, 09:28 PM) *
Terrible cut, just bad vision on the play. I'm pretty sure I could've picked up almost 10 there.

He just looks slow. Which is pretty much what I expected. But man, you either gotta get through that hole or break that first tackle.

Brutal.

Celek's block leaves a lot to be desired too.
The Franchise
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 13 2017, 10:54 PM) *
He just looks slow. Which is pretty much what I expected. But man, you either gotta get through that hole or break that first tackle.

Brutal.

Celek's block leaves a lot to be desired too.


I disagree with nothing you said, but remember this was posted by a douche who desperately wanted to be right about him being cut.

Terrible play by Blount, and Celek's lack of a block left no room for error. If it becomes a trend then I'll worry.
nephillymike
Caplan said last night that it won't be long until Clement is in the mix.

He thought if not this week, then the NYG game would be when Clement sees action.
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 14 2017, 05:14 AM) *
Caplan said last night that it won't be long until Clement is in the mix.

He thought if not this week, then the NYG game would be when Clement sees action.

Caplan is pretty tuned in. I wouldn't be surprised if Clement turned into our feature back at some point this season.
Joegrane
This does not sound like the draft review of a feature back, especially with 4.68 40 speed.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profiles/cor...ment?id=2557861

However, if Blount does not produce, Clement could take some reps away in non-short-yardage situations.

I liked that Clement was a willing blocker in blitz pickup situations in preseason. Jaws and Caplin talked about Blount's lack of willingness and effort in such situations, and that is at 250 lbs!

Blount is not going to be a popular player in Philly unless he comes to play on Sunday. Doesn't he realize this is probably his last year in the NFL? Someone ought to pay to have Blount go to lunch with AI so he can learn about Philly

The Eagles did not invest much $ in Blount so if he is only a short-yardage, rotational guy and late 4th quarter hammer, I am fine with that.

I don't expect to see significant reps for Clement in the near future unless there is an injury. I won't be surprised if he gets a few carries just so he'll have some game day experience. RBs get nicked up. You need depth.

QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 14 2017, 08:23 AM) *
Caplan is pretty tuned in. I wouldn't be surprised if Clement turned into our feature back at some point this season.
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (Joegrane @ Sep 14 2017, 09:46 AM) *
This does not sound like the draft review of a feature back, especially with 4.68 40 speed.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profiles/cor...ment?id=2557861

I don't know if it would be an earned role or more of something out of necessity. He's a talented guy that didn't have his head on straight. He plays quicker than he does fast/straight line speed.

I'm not saying he's anything special, but he may just be the best back on our roster. If his head is in the game, then maybe he has a chance. The fact that he's showing well on special teams is a good sign with regards to his effort.
mcnabbulous
The cut watch is officially on. Zero carries today.
The Franchise
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 17 2017, 05:02 PM) *
The cut watch is officially on. Zero carries today.


QUOTE
Idiots wanted him cut. End of story.


And that still holds true.
Eyrie
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 17 2017, 10:02 PM) *
The cut watch is officially on. Zero carries today.

Be interesting to know how many snaps he got. Instinct says it was similar to Smallwood, who at least got one carry (albeit with no room) and Sproles probably had half the snaps on his own.

Those are not good numbers for Blount.
The Franchise
QUOTE (Eyrie @ Sep 17 2017, 05:05 PM) *
Be interesting to know how many snaps he got. Instinct says it was similar to Smallwood, who at least got one carry (albeit with no room) and Sproles probably had half the snaps on his own.

Those are not good numbers for Blount.


At most he was on the field for 5 snaps. Smallwood got significantly more, and completely stunk up the joint.
D Rock
Our run blocking is a joke. To think, morons were claiming it was a potentially best unit in the league. What a joke.
nephillymike
He was pretty calm in his post game interview, although on CSN, they said he left the field earlier than the other players.

Listen, I am probably the most "Run the Damn Ball" guy around.

And I know, the run to pass ratio was whacked.

However, with the holes that the OL was giving, only Sproles is guick enough to get through them. Blount isn't. Smallwood had no holes. Sproles got a good 4.8 yds per attempt, problem is you can't overwork him. We don't have Mathews, McCoy or Westbrook. Except for Sproles, our RB's are just another guy. Seumalo is struggling big time (it's a shame Barbre isn't here to take over and Warmack isn't good enough to be activated), Kelce has no push.

They could give the ball to Blount to massage the critics. Problem is, fat boy ain't getting 4.0 yds per carry to justify the investment. I haven't given up on Smallwood yet and I am hopeful that Clement can be adequate. Pumphrey blows. Maybe if they bench Isaac for Wiz it will be an improvement. It will be an open wound all year.
The Franchise
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 17 2017, 06:04 PM) *
However, with the holes that the OL was giving, only Sproles is guick enough to get through them. Blount isn't. Smallwood had no holes. Sproles got a good 4.8 yds per attempt, problem is you can't overwork him.


Am I the only person on earth constantly saying Sproles and Blount need to be on the field at the same time?

At least then nobody knows what is coming. If you're lining up Blount everyone knows it's a run up the gut. And yes, Sproles can't be overworked.

It's pretty ridiculous to write him off after a decent game against the Redskins and virtually no chances today.
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 17 2017, 06:16 PM) *
It's pretty ridiculous to write him off after a decent game against the Redskins and virtually no chances today.

He averaged 3.28 ypc against the Redskins, which is likely why he had no chances today.
The Franchise
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 17 2017, 06:18 PM) *
He averaged 3.28 ypc against the Redskins, which is likely why he had no chances today.


Sproles and Smallwood averaged 1 yard per carry. Smallwood improved today to 1.3. So naturally he'll be benched next week?
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 17 2017, 06:23 PM) *
Sproles and Smallwood averaged 1 yard per carry. Smallwood improved today to 1.3. So naturally he'll be benched next week?

Maybe. I guess we'll see if he looked like he was running through molasses while running through huge holes.

As I said this week, I'd like to see Clement starting to get more carries.
nephillymike
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 17 2017, 06:16 PM) *
Am I the only person on earth constantly saying Sproles and Blount need to be on the field at the same time?

At least then nobody knows what is coming. If you're lining up Blount everyone knows it's a run up the gut. And yes, Sproles can't be overworked.

It's pretty ridiculous to write him off after a decent game against the Redskins and virtually no chances today.


That may be worth trying. I don't think you do it too often.

However, if you want to put your best offensive weapons on the field, I think the order is:

Ertz
Jefferey
Sproles
Smith
Agholar
Burton
Blount

We are not good enough to put our 7th best weapon on the field that often.
The Franchise
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 17 2017, 06:46 PM) *
That may be worth trying. I don't think you do it too often.

However, if you want to put your best offensive weapons on the field, I think the order is:

Ertz
Jefferey
Sproles
Smith
Agholar
Burton
Blount

We are not good enough to put our 7th best weapon on the field that often.


C'mon man, this is just hater shit. Burton? Agholor, who if not for garbage time wouldn't even have a catch?

He scored 18 fucking td's last year. Ok, so he didn't look great against Washington. He still did decent enough all things considered, and now isn't even on the field. It's insanity to write him off right now.
nephillymike
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 17 2017, 07:04 PM) *
C'mon man, this is just hater shit. Burton? Agholor, who if not for garbage time wouldn't even have a catch?

He scored 18 fucking td's last year. Ok, so he didn't look great against Washington. He still did decent enough all things considered, and now isn't even on the field. It's insanity to write him off right now.

Do you think him being 15 pounds heavier can make last year's success less likely?

mcnabbulous
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 17 2017, 07:21 PM) *
Do you think him being 15 pounds heavier can make last year's success less likely?

It's almost like someone on this board has never heard of the wheels falling off for an athlete in his 30s.
The Franchise
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 17 2017, 07:21 PM) *
Do you think him being 15 pounds heavier can make last year's success less likely?


Dude, you said he was less of a weapon than Burton. That's pure hater shit.

I have no personal connection to Blount - I felt it was a great signing for cheap, someone who could get those 3rd and shorts. He scored 18 fucking times last year. He isn't Barry Sanders, but to write him off now is sheer lunacy, that's all I'm saying.
Eyrie
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 18 2017, 01:23 AM) *
It's almost like someone on this board has never heard of the wheels falling off for an athlete in his 30s.

Which makes Sproles all the more remarkable.

Of course, it helps that he isn't carrying extra poundage.
nephillymike
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 17 2017, 09:23 PM) *
Dude, you said he was less of a weapon than Burton. That's pure hater shit.

I have no personal connection to Blount - I felt it was a great signing for cheap, someone who could get those 3rd and shorts. He scored 18 fucking times last year. He isn't Barry Sanders, but to write him off now is sheer lunacy, that's all I'm saying.


I see your point. I was hopeful too. Going by what I've seen in the preseason and the few carries in the games and what every writer has sai about the practices, I am not confident in his ability. Then Caplan mentions the weight, and the lack of effort in pass protection, and I lose patience. Given the ineffectiveness of Smallwood, they can give him a shot if they want. But Smallwood had a good preseason game and good reviews in training camp. As quick as Sproles had to be for the 4.8 average yesterday, realistically, I don't think Blount is nearly as effective. If your point is give him the three carries Smallwood had, then I guess. We just don't have the luxury of wasted plays.
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (Eyrie @ Sep 18 2017, 04:46 AM) *
Which makes Sproles all the more remarkable.

Of course, it helps that he isn't carrying extra poundage.

The lack of extra poundage helps. The fact that the has never been a featured back (and had 100 carries in a season) also adds life to those legs.

He's a freak.
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 17 2017, 09:23 PM) *
Dude, you said he was less of a weapon than Burton. That's pure hater shit.

I have no personal connection to Blount - I felt it was a great signing for cheap, someone who could get those 3rd and shorts. He scored 18 fucking times last year. He isn't Barry Sanders, but to write him off now is sheer lunacy, that's all I'm saying.

The team he scored "18 fucking times" for thought he was worth writing off.
D Rock
Anybody who thinks Blount has anything left at all other than a love for jelly donuts is guilty of fan-boy fawning.

Dude is fat. Dude is SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW. Dude is done.
Joegrane
Is he worth keeping around for short yardage situations?

QUOTE (D Rock @ Sep 18 2017, 09:08 AM) *
Anybody who thinks Blount has anything left at all other than a love for jelly donuts is guilty of fan-boy fawning.

Dude is fat. Dude is SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW. Dude is done.

mcnabbulous
QUOTE (Joegrane @ Sep 18 2017, 09:34 AM) *
Is he worth keeping around for short yardage situations?

I'd rather have a quick back for short yardage than a big back.
The Franchise
QUOTE
Anybody who thinks Blount has anything left at all other than a love for jelly donuts is guilty of fan-boy fawning.


Like Belichick?

QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 18 2017, 08:49 AM) *
The team he scored "18 fucking times" for thought he was worth writing off.


No, they thought he was worth bringing back, which is why they made him an offer. He wanted more, and they held firm, as the Pats are known to do. Unless you're Tom Brady, you ain't playing hard ball with Belichick. Now he gets to sit on the bench and watch us throw all day, and hear about how much he sucks, instead of scoring touchdowns and picking up short yardage from a coach that knows how to use him.

I just have to laugh at this shit. Eagles fans really deserve our reputation sometimes. Guy has a monster year, gets signed, has a below average first game, gets almost no playing time the second.....HE'S FINISHED LOL.

wacko.gif
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 18 2017, 01:45 PM) *
Like Belichick?



No, they thought he was worth bringing back, which is why they made him an offer. He wanted more, and they held firm, as the Pats are known to do. Unless you're Tom Brady, you ain't playing hard ball with Belichick. Now he gets to sit on the bench and watch us throw all day, and hear about how much he sucks, instead of scoring touchdowns and picking up short yardage from a coach that knows how to use him.

I just have to laugh at this shit. Eagles fans really deserve our reputation sometimes. Guy has a monster year, gets signed, has a below average first game, gets almost no playing time the second.....HE'S FINISHED LOL.

wacko.gif

Yeah, okay dipshit
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2017/5/10/1561...nfl-free-agency

QUOTE
After two months of free agency, the Patriots have offered starting tailback LeGarrette Blount a contract. However, with seven other backs currently on the roster, the tender may be more shrewd strategy than earnest declaration of interest.

New England offered Blount a one-year, $1.1 million contract Tuesday, but the deal appears more like a ploy to recoup a compensatory draft pick should a rival franchise show interest down the road. If another team offers the bruising back a deal, the Patriots will have the option to either match those new terms or receive a compensatory pick in return.
The Franchise
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 18 2017, 02:54 PM) *
Yeah, okay dipshit


laugh.gif

You're as predictable as Andy, without the intelligence or annual 4 months of success. So they made him an offer, and someone else signed him for more, and they decided not to match it? Wow, stop the presses!

They wanted him back - for the right price. He chose to go elsewhere for more. Therefore, once again you're wrong about something related to football. Aren't you used to it by now, you sad little beta cuck?
mcnabbulous
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 18 2017, 02:01 PM) *
laugh.gif

You're as predictable as Andy, without the intelligence or annual 4 months of success. So they made him an offer, and someone else signed him for more, and they decided not to match it? Wow, stop the presses!

They wanted him back - for the right price. He chose to go elsewhere for more. Therefore, once again you're wrong about something related to football. Aren't you used to it by now, you sad little beta cuck?

No. They didn't want him back. That is made clear in the article (and every article about the subject) and the fact that they had 7 RBs on their roster when they made the offer.

You think they signed a restricted free agent (Gillislee) only to have him share goal line carries with Blount? I sure hope you're not as ugly as you are stupid.
The Franchise
QUOTE (mcnabbulous @ Sep 18 2017, 03:10 PM) *
No. They didn't want him back. That is made clear in the article (and every article about the subject) and the fact that they had 7 RBs on their roster when they made the offer.


The article is speculation, which is *gasp* what average sportswriters do. The fact is, he was given an offer at a price they were willing to pay, and he was offered more by someone else. They didn't match it. You're just running with this because you're upset at always being proven wrong about running the ball, and desperate to grasp at any straw you can.

Is this you?

Aquila
Cut the personal abuse please.
The Franchise
QUOTE
Who wanted Blount cut?


Not I, said The Franchise.

Watching him punish the defense the 1st half was awesome. And remember, his carries come with absolutely no creativity or surprise whatsoever from Pederson.

It's criminal that he didn't get more touches.
nephillymike
QUOTE (The Franchise @ Sep 24 2017, 03:52 PM) *
Not I, said The Franchise.

Watching him punish the defense the 1st half was awesome. And remember, his carries come with absolutely no creativity or surprise whatsoever from Pederson.

It's criminal that he didn't get more touches.

I stand corrected!

Fat boy can run.

I would have run him more in this game.

Especially when Vernon got hurt. I would have run 29 right at him.
The Franchise
QUOTE (nephillymike @ Sep 24 2017, 05:00 PM) *
I stand corrected!

Fat boy can run.

I would have run him more in this game.

Especially when Vernon got hurt. I would have run 29 right at him.


He should've had 20 carries by the end of the 3rd quarter. You could tell early he was wearing down the Giants D. Granted, Smallwood looked slightly less like a waste of a roster spot today, but he doesn't scare anyone. Nobody wants to tackle Blount, and he was gone for long stretches of the game. No doubt that was a factor in letting the Giants creep back into it.
Eyrie
Blount played well today.

No-one will want him cut if he can continue to produce like that.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2017 Invision Power Services, Inc.